Skip to content

Interview: JL - HNW Account Handler

Date: 2025-11-19 Interviewee: JL (Account Handler - High Net Worth clients) Format: In-person (informal discussion) Note: Rough notes from unrecorded conversation

Key Responsibilities

  • Managing High Net Worth client relationships
  • Obtaining quotes from multiple insurers via web portals
  • Submitting presentations to insurers
  • Client communication (phone, email, SMS, WhatsApp, Teams)
  • Manual data entry into insurer portals

Current Workflow & Tools

Insurer Interaction Process

JL and Steve share the workload of manually entering client data into at least 4 different insurer web portals (all web-based, no API integration). This is required for each quote request.

Communication Channels

  • Phone: Preferred for quick answers from clients
  • Microsoft Teams: Used for scheduled conversations with clients ("locking people down" - gets in diary)
  • Email: Standard business communication
  • SMS/WhatsApp:
  • Receives client messages via both
  • Current process: Screenshots WhatsApp conversations and manually uploads to Acturis
  • No integration = significant friction

Presentation Generation

  • Acturis generates initial presentation from form field data
  • JL typically edits the generated document manually
  • Risk identified: Edited presentation can diverge from Acturis system of record
  • Consultant insight: AI could compare generated vs. edited versions to flag discrepancies

Pain Points & Frustrations

1. Insurer Interaction Friction (PRIMARY ISSUE)

Manual Portal Data Entry: - Entering same client data across 4+ insurer web portals - Repetitive, time-consuming work - No automation or API integration available

Slow Insurer Responses: - Insurers increasingly using lower-paid admin staff instead of decision-makers - Poor productivity from insurer side - Constant chasing required for quotes and responses

Quote: "constantly bogged down with the grind of chasing insurers"

Opportunity Cost: If freed from this administrative burden, JL would be: - Meeting property agents - Prospecting for new clients - Business development activities

2. SMS/WhatsApp Documentation Burden

  • Manual screenshot and upload process for each conversation
  • Time-consuming and error-prone
  • Breaks communication flow

3. Quality Control Gap

  • No formal quality control process at EF
  • Only ad-hoc spot checks by TH and MD
  • Contrast with JL's previous employer (larger broker) where all communications were checked and measured

Strategic Insights

Client Relationship Management

  • HNW client work is hard to automate - personal connection is critical
  • Low bar for customer service in insurance industry = competitive advantage opportunity
  • Proactive file review before renewals could differentiate EF from competitors
  • JL prefers immediate control over communications (vs. outsourced team at previous employer)

Market & Product Insights

  • E-trading only viable for <£1m rebuild value properties
  • EF would benefit from expanding insurer panel
  • Current manual processes likely limit capacity to work with more insurers

Process Philosophy

JL has experience from much larger broker where: - All incoming/outgoing communication was checked and measured - Outgoing emails written by outsourced team - More structured but less immediate

His preference: Keep immediacy and personal control, but reduce administrative friction

Critical Finding

Priority #1 (Renewals/Re-marketing) may have been misunderstood:

Initial focus was on client-facing aspects of renewals process. JL's feedback reveals the bigger friction point is INSURER-FACING work:

  1. Manual data entry into multiple insurer portals
  2. Chasing slow insurer responses
  3. Managing asynchronous communication with insurers
  4. Quote aggregation and comparison

The client relationship part is less painful - it's the insurer interaction that bogs down the team.

Implications for Priority Areas

Renewals & Re-marketing (Priority #1)

  • Focus needed on insurer portal automation
  • Quote chasing automation
  • Communication tracking with insurers

Submission Presentation (Priority #3)

  • More complex than initially understood
  • Manual editing creates data sync risk with Acturis
  • Opportunity: AI-powered comparison of generated vs. edited presentations
  • Opportunity: Quality control automation (gap identified)

Initial Risk Capture (Priority #2)

  • SMS/WhatsApp integration now confirmed as friction point
  • Not just phone call transcription - need multi-channel capture
  • 3CX research should include WhatsApp integration possibilities

Insurer Panel Expansion (New Insight)

  • Current manual processes limit capacity
  • Automation could enable working with more insurers
  • More insurer options = better service to clients

Technology Opportunities Identified

Immediate Impact

  1. Insurer portal automation - Biggest pain point for JL
  2. SMS/WhatsApp to Acturis integration - Clear friction, manual workaround exists
  3. Quote aggregation automation - Reduce chasing burden

Medium-Term

  1. Presentation quality control AI - Compare generated vs. edited, flag discrepancies
  2. Proactive renewal file review - Competitive differentiator
  3. Communication tracking across channels - Unified view

Strategic

  1. Insurer panel expansion enablement - Automation allows more insurer relationships
  2. Quality assurance automation - Replace manual spot checks

Follow-up Questions

  • How many unique insurer portals does EF interact with in total?
  • What is the typical time to enter a single property into one insurer portal?
  • What is the average response time from insurers? (and how variable?)
  • What percentage of JL's time is spent on portal data entry vs. insurer chasing?
  • Are there any insurers that offer API integration or automated submission?
  • What triggers JL to edit the Acturis-generated presentation?
  • How often do edited presentations need to be updated in Acturis afterward?
  • What volume of SMS/WhatsApp messages per week?

Action Items

  • Investigate insurer portal automation options (RPA, API availability)
  • Research SMS/WhatsApp to Acturis integration possibilities (3CX may help here)
  • Map complete insurer interaction workflow with JL (detailed observation session)
  • Quantify time spent on insurer portal data entry vs. other tasks
  • Document presentation editing triggers and patterns
  • Interview Steve (who shares portal data entry workload)

Key Quotes

"constantly bogged down with the grind of chasing insurers"

[On where he'd focus time if freed from admin work]

"The bar is low for customer service in the insurance industry, it's easy for EF to do better"

[On competitive positioning]

"High Net Worth client work is hard to automate, personal connection is important"

[On relationship-driven nature of HNW business]

  • Initial discovery meeting with TH: Summary
  • Acturis technical discovery: Summary
  • 3CX Telephony & AI research: Analysis

Consultant Analysis

This interview significantly reframes understanding of Priority #1 (Renewals):

Previous understanding: Client-facing renewals process complexity Revised understanding: Insurer-facing administrative burden is the primary pain point

The friction isn't in the client relationship - it's in: 1. Manual data entry across multiple insurer systems 2. Chasing slow, increasingly admin-focused insurer contacts 3. Managing async communication at scale

This suggests insurer portal automation and quote aggregation should be prioritized over purely client-facing automation.

Additionally, JL's insights about SMS/WhatsApp friction and presentation editing risks provide clear, actionable opportunities that weren't apparent from the initial discovery meeting.

Strategic insight: Automating insurer interactions could unlock capacity to expand the insurer panel, which JL identified as beneficial for client service quality.