Interview: JL - HNW Account Handler¶
Date: 2025-11-19 Interviewee: JL (Account Handler - High Net Worth clients) Format: In-person (informal discussion) Note: Rough notes from unrecorded conversation
Key Responsibilities¶
- Managing High Net Worth client relationships
- Obtaining quotes from multiple insurers via web portals
- Submitting presentations to insurers
- Client communication (phone, email, SMS, WhatsApp, Teams)
- Manual data entry into insurer portals
Current Workflow & Tools¶
Insurer Interaction Process¶
JL and Steve share the workload of manually entering client data into at least 4 different insurer web portals (all web-based, no API integration). This is required for each quote request.
Communication Channels¶
- Phone: Preferred for quick answers from clients
- Microsoft Teams: Used for scheduled conversations with clients ("locking people down" - gets in diary)
- Email: Standard business communication
- SMS/WhatsApp:
- Receives client messages via both
- Current process: Screenshots WhatsApp conversations and manually uploads to Acturis
- No integration = significant friction
Presentation Generation¶
- Acturis generates initial presentation from form field data
- JL typically edits the generated document manually
- Risk identified: Edited presentation can diverge from Acturis system of record
- Consultant insight: AI could compare generated vs. edited versions to flag discrepancies
Pain Points & Frustrations¶
1. Insurer Interaction Friction (PRIMARY ISSUE)¶
Manual Portal Data Entry: - Entering same client data across 4+ insurer web portals - Repetitive, time-consuming work - No automation or API integration available
Slow Insurer Responses: - Insurers increasingly using lower-paid admin staff instead of decision-makers - Poor productivity from insurer side - Constant chasing required for quotes and responses
Quote: "constantly bogged down with the grind of chasing insurers"
Opportunity Cost: If freed from this administrative burden, JL would be: - Meeting property agents - Prospecting for new clients - Business development activities
2. SMS/WhatsApp Documentation Burden¶
- Manual screenshot and upload process for each conversation
- Time-consuming and error-prone
- Breaks communication flow
3. Quality Control Gap¶
- No formal quality control process at EF
- Only ad-hoc spot checks by TH and MD
- Contrast with JL's previous employer (larger broker) where all communications were checked and measured
Strategic Insights¶
Client Relationship Management¶
- HNW client work is hard to automate - personal connection is critical
- Low bar for customer service in insurance industry = competitive advantage opportunity
- Proactive file review before renewals could differentiate EF from competitors
- JL prefers immediate control over communications (vs. outsourced team at previous employer)
Market & Product Insights¶
- E-trading only viable for <£1m rebuild value properties
- EF would benefit from expanding insurer panel
- Current manual processes likely limit capacity to work with more insurers
Process Philosophy¶
JL has experience from much larger broker where: - All incoming/outgoing communication was checked and measured - Outgoing emails written by outsourced team - More structured but less immediate
His preference: Keep immediacy and personal control, but reduce administrative friction
Critical Finding¶
Priority #1 (Renewals/Re-marketing) may have been misunderstood:
Initial focus was on client-facing aspects of renewals process. JL's feedback reveals the bigger friction point is INSURER-FACING work:
- Manual data entry into multiple insurer portals
- Chasing slow insurer responses
- Managing asynchronous communication with insurers
- Quote aggregation and comparison
The client relationship part is less painful - it's the insurer interaction that bogs down the team.
Implications for Priority Areas¶
Renewals & Re-marketing (Priority #1)¶
- Focus needed on insurer portal automation
- Quote chasing automation
- Communication tracking with insurers
Submission Presentation (Priority #3)¶
- More complex than initially understood
- Manual editing creates data sync risk with Acturis
- Opportunity: AI-powered comparison of generated vs. edited presentations
- Opportunity: Quality control automation (gap identified)
Initial Risk Capture (Priority #2)¶
- SMS/WhatsApp integration now confirmed as friction point
- Not just phone call transcription - need multi-channel capture
- 3CX research should include WhatsApp integration possibilities
Insurer Panel Expansion (New Insight)¶
- Current manual processes limit capacity
- Automation could enable working with more insurers
- More insurer options = better service to clients
Technology Opportunities Identified¶
Immediate Impact¶
- Insurer portal automation - Biggest pain point for JL
- SMS/WhatsApp to Acturis integration - Clear friction, manual workaround exists
- Quote aggregation automation - Reduce chasing burden
Medium-Term¶
- Presentation quality control AI - Compare generated vs. edited, flag discrepancies
- Proactive renewal file review - Competitive differentiator
- Communication tracking across channels - Unified view
Strategic¶
- Insurer panel expansion enablement - Automation allows more insurer relationships
- Quality assurance automation - Replace manual spot checks
Follow-up Questions¶
- How many unique insurer portals does EF interact with in total?
- What is the typical time to enter a single property into one insurer portal?
- What is the average response time from insurers? (and how variable?)
- What percentage of JL's time is spent on portal data entry vs. insurer chasing?
- Are there any insurers that offer API integration or automated submission?
- What triggers JL to edit the Acturis-generated presentation?
- How often do edited presentations need to be updated in Acturis afterward?
- What volume of SMS/WhatsApp messages per week?
Action Items¶
- Investigate insurer portal automation options (RPA, API availability)
- Research SMS/WhatsApp to Acturis integration possibilities (3CX may help here)
- Map complete insurer interaction workflow with JL (detailed observation session)
- Quantify time spent on insurer portal data entry vs. other tasks
- Document presentation editing triggers and patterns
- Interview Steve (who shares portal data entry workload)
Key Quotes¶
"constantly bogged down with the grind of chasing insurers"
[On where he'd focus time if freed from admin work]
"The bar is low for customer service in the insurance industry, it's easy for EF to do better"
[On competitive positioning]
"High Net Worth client work is hard to automate, personal connection is important"
[On relationship-driven nature of HNW business]
Related Notes¶
- Initial discovery meeting with TH: Summary
- Acturis technical discovery: Summary
- 3CX Telephony & AI research: Analysis
Consultant Analysis¶
This interview significantly reframes understanding of Priority #1 (Renewals):
Previous understanding: Client-facing renewals process complexity Revised understanding: Insurer-facing administrative burden is the primary pain point
The friction isn't in the client relationship - it's in: 1. Manual data entry across multiple insurer systems 2. Chasing slow, increasingly admin-focused insurer contacts 3. Managing async communication at scale
This suggests insurer portal automation and quote aggregation should be prioritized over purely client-facing automation.
Additionally, JL's insights about SMS/WhatsApp friction and presentation editing risks provide clear, actionable opportunities that weren't apparent from the initial discovery meeting.
Strategic insight: Automating insurer interactions could unlock capacity to expand the insurer panel, which JL identified as beneficial for client service quality.